When we aren't allowed to ask questions? We must question everything
During the Lockdowns, Mary's level of anxiety was acute which led to a lot of worry over health and vaccine mandates during a period of isolation where there was no one to discuss the many concerns.
The pressures and the divide became apparent early on after the roll out of new vaccines and the banning of free speech, informed opinions becoming something that was not allowed to be freely talked about in any circle - simply labelled as 'misinformation'. For someone that believes in natural remedies where possible, Mary would argue that bodily autonomy should be something we hold sacred, if not for ourselves, then for our children - as they are our future. If we don't question our liberty during a time of crisis, we may later lose our freedoms as bills are passed without public knowledge during these times. When we are controlled by governments who abuse their powers to suit their own agenda and line their own pockets, via shares in vaccines, PPE etc then we must question this and expose the truths behind it.
(https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/world/story/did-rishi-sunak-benefit-from-covid-vaccine-maker-modernas-stock-rise-heres-what-the-uk-pm-has-to-say-370386-2023-02-15)
UK Presenter Neil Oliver has been one to voice his opinion since Lockdown. It is he and others that saw through the misinformation that was being reported through the media and used against them to blacken their reputations and character. It was a constant battlefield during the lockdowns trying to maintain a parent /child relationship, as the home became a school as well as a place of work and children were allowed to make the choice themselves at school about taking the novel Covid Vaccine. Many children went along with the majority for fear of not wanting to appear 'different'. Of which just in the nick of time to counteract any hesitancy came along the great marketing about Gillick compentence, although ordinarily giving children no rights but they could easily take a vaccine that had no historical data against their parents wishes.
'if a child, under the age of 18, is able to understand and appreciate the nature of the medical treatment they are receiving, they are able to consent to it. A child with Gillick competence is able to receive medical treatment, even if their parents DO NOT consent to this'
(https://www.alsterskelley.com/covid-vaccine-can-a-child-decide)
There were alot of highly esteemed medical voices that were 'silenced' during this period that have been since been proved 'correct' on their knowledge on epidimeology and virus control and the overall benefits to lockdowns and vaccines. In the age of mass communication, people should have been able to hear these voices and make an 'informed decision'. There were no 'alternative' measures advocated which could have benefited and saved so many lives, such as the original medicines including Ivermectin (which was banned) and other lifestyle choices such as anti-inflammatory foods, vitamins such as vitamin D and C, minerals, fitness and freshair.
(7th May 2024) The Astra Zeneca COVID-19 Vaccine was withdrawn after revealing that they knew from the outset there were possible 'rare' fatal bloodclots amongst other adverse conditions. Those affected are now able to apply for compensation.
This was the notice given by The Guardian
"On 7 May, the European Medicines Agency issued a notice that the vaccine is no longer authorised for use."
(accessed 9th May :https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/08/astrazeneca-withdraws-covid-19-vaccine-worldwide-citing-surplus-of-newer-vaccines#:~:text=On%207%20May%2C%20the%20European,to%20target%20Covid%2D19%20variants.)
The Independent reported:
"Pharmaceutical giant Astra Zeneca has admitted that its widely used Covid vaccine, branded Covidshield, can cause rare side effects including blood clots and low platelet count. Covishield was developed by the British-Swedish company in collaboration with Oxford University, UK, and produced by the Serum Institude of India. It was widely administered in over 150 countries, including Britain and India.Some studies conducted during the pandemic found the vaccine was 60-80% effective in protecting against the novel coronavirus.However, research has since found that Covishield can cause some people to develop blood clots, which may prove fatal. A class action lawsuit filed in the UK claimed that the vaccine led to deaths and severe injuries and sought damages up to £100m for about 50 victims.The World Health Organization confirmed that Covishield can have life-threatening side effects. “A very rare adverse event called Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome, involving unusual and severe blood clotting events associated with low platelet counts, has been reported after vaccination with this vaccine.” (accessed 9th May : https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-blood-clots-b2536898.html)